Research Updates

Assessing workplace productivity losses. Questioning the questionnaires

Hannah Bourne

When looking at the factors which impact upon workplace productivity, we also need to look at the studies that assessed them.
Take Home Messages:

Surveys such as the Work Productivity Short Inventory (WPSI) and the Work Limitations Questionnaire (WLQ) may provide an effective means of assessing workplace productivity losses. 

Why the research matters:

There is increasing evidence to suggest that the health of workers has a significant impact on workplace productivity.  But in order to assess the impact of health on productivity, appropriate data collection tools must be developed.

What the research involved:

This study looked at the use of two different surveys for assessing workplace productivity and time lost due to illness:

  • The Work Productivity Short Inventory (WPSI); and
  • The Work Limitations Questionnaire (WLQ). 

These two tools were trailed on the same employees working at a large telecommunications firm.

Summary of research findings:

The study found:

  • The average losses due to decreased workplace productivity were $2000 to $2800 per employee per year; and
  • Decreased productivity was associated with perceived health status and the existence of particular medical conditions.

In comparing the two surveys, the study ascertained that:

  • The average losses in workplace productivity were 4.9% as measured by the WLQ and 6.9% as measured by the WPSI;
  • The WLQ is useful for assessing:
  • Overall productivity concerns; and
  • The impact on productivity of the worker’s ability to handle physical, mental, interpersonal, time management, and workload challenges; and
  • The WPSI is useful for:
  • Assessing the impact of individual diseases or conditions on productivity; and
  • Estimating the financial losses caused by decreased productivity.
Original research:

The application of two health and productivity instruments at a large employer.

Ozminkowski RJ, Goetzel RZ, Chang S, Long S.

J Occup Environ Med. 2004 Jul;46(7):635-48.

Link to PubMed abstract